OCTOBER 20239Everyone has a responsibility for food safety regardless of function in the organization; food safety is not a one size fits all, assess the risk unique to the process, product, and environment and implement appropriate validated preventive controlsportance of engaging with and involving your people to foster collaboration and promote a sense of ownership cannot be overemphasized. Another key aspect of developing a sustainable food safety system is empowering workers/team members to speak up and take action. Recognition is also critical to encourage and reinforce `doing things right.' The following are some key prereq-uisite programs, preventive measures, and governance that organizations must implement for sustainable food safety:Ingredient Hazard Analysis (IHA)Risk assessment is a very important concept in food safety. Food safety risk ranking is the systematic analysis and ordering of foodborne hazards and/or foods regarding the potential public health threat based on the likelihood of occurrence and severity of the adverse impacts on human health. Im-plementing adequate preventive controls de-pend on accurately determining food safety hazards and appropriate risk level. For example, the risk might be ranked as High, Medium, or Low. Asking the right questions based on an exquisite understanding of your product, its manufacturing processes, and its intended use, reviewing appropriate docu-ments (internal and external), and deep dive into the supplier's historical data and related information are some of the key steps in food safety risk assessments. FDA Appen-dix 1 (Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food: Draft Guidance for Industry) is a great resource for food safety hazards related information applicable to various product categories. There are also digital platforms trending in the food industry, such as Food Chain IDTM, Horizon scanTM, and DecernisTM - food fraud databases as tools to facilitate infor-mation gathering, especially for ingredients sourced globally. Sanitary Design StandardThis provides guidelines on the design and construction of buildings, infrastructures, and equipment to promote cleaning effec-tiveness, efficiency and prevent cross-con-tamination of food products. Designs are unique for different product and process applications. For example, equipment design for meat and poultry processing is not identical to confectionery. Different soil profiles demand different cleaning methods and have different chemical requirements. A standardized checklist for factory assess-ments at the manufacturer and during installation at the plants with cross-func-tional sign-offs, including engineering, quality, food safety, and operations, must be in place. Early involvement and cross-func-tional collaboration are key for successful and consistent implementation. Environmental Monitoring Program (Pathogens and Indicators)Some people say they have never had a pos-itive hit in their facilities. It could be a good thing but also a bad one. This begs whether they are swabbing enough, swabbing the right locations, or using the right method. A robust EMP program must be risk-based, including factors such as the age of the facility or equipment, type or nature of the product, processing type, hygienic zoning, cleaning method or frequency, and historical data. The number of swabs across zones 1-4 and frequency should be appropriate for the risk level defined. Air monitoring in the processing or surrounding areas is critical to identifying potential airborne micro risks. Another crucial aspect of EMP programs is data tracking and trending to identify the hot spots and follow up with adequate corrective actions. Allergen Management ProgramFood allergen recalls could occur due to cross-contact or exposure and undeclared allergen on product labels. It is imperative to have a comprehensive allergen manage-ment program end to end, from ingredients sourcing to finished product distribution. This includes but is not limited to major allergen declaration requirements for all suppliers, validated allergen cleaning and verification using rapid allergen-specific testing kits or finished product testing, formula and product verification, segregated production and storage areas, and produc-tion sequencing.Food Safety KPIsThere must be a continuous measure of performance to ensure the food safety management system is working as intended. Confirmed internal findings, Master Sanita-tion Schedule (MSS) completion rate, First Time Right (FTR), and Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) are some of the food safety KPIs to routinely track and trend, and review at various management levels.In summary, everyone is responsible for food safety regardless of function in the organization; food safety is not a one size fits all; assess the risk unique to the process, product, and environment and implement appropri-ate validated preventive controls. And most of all, never forget that no matter how robust and sustainable your food safety system is, it must be updated and changed. Food Safety is very dynamic. A new threat or challenge to your cur-rent systems might be approaching.
< Page 8 | Page 10 >